Golf Clubs and Supplies

17 Responses to “Mizuno MP 57 Golf Club Review”

1. onkai Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   perfect, thank you …
   perfect, thank you very much for your reply. I swing my 6 iron around 95 - 100 mph, so will this mp57 work for my game?or will i get a too high ball flight?since i am also thinking about the mp 67or mp 62 according to your other review video.thx a lot.

2. 4golfonline Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   The ball flight is …
   The ball flight is good, very good control and not to high. The flight is subject to your swing speed I swing my 6 iron around 85/90 mph. I was using a dynamic gold s300 shaft.

3. onkai Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   how’s the ball …
   how’s the ball flight and what shaft are u using on the mp 57?

4. onkai Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   is it true that …
   is it true that this mp 57 will lose some distance?

5. wang1433 Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   That would depend …
   That would depend on what kind of 16 are you. If irons are your strength and you play off 16, then the MP 5X may be ok. The MPs are also better if you don’t dig a lot.

6. Stringstrong Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   it depends how you …
   it depends how you strike the ball, if it’s your short game which lets you down primarily then you might be ok with the mizuno mp series

7. 4golfonline Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   Well that is a bit …
   Well that is a bit black and white, the MX range is aimed at your hcap player but the MP range if hit well performs like no other club.

8. andy55055 Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   Is it true that the …
   Is it true that the mizuno mp’s should only be played by single digit h’cappers? I’m off 16 and the guy in the golf shop said the mizuno mx series would be better for me. Is this true?

9. FAHiez Says:
   November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

   I think these are …
   I think these are the best mizuno mp irons there so easy 2 hit !

10. Lookatthenoob Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    they aren’t? and if …
    they aren’t? and if they are because they are an older model?

11. TampaTundra Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    More than likely …
    More than likely because the 52’s are new this year, where the 57’s while they are not old by any means, have been on the market a little while.

12. DrGolfJam Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Why are the Mp 57s …
    Why are the Mp 57s on average £200 cheaper than the Mp 52s?

13. grenerd84 Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    listen to the …
    listen to the review, the shaft saves some weight but because of the construction of the nano speed cavity back, vs the mizuno “cavity” (it is more like a blade with a muscle back). cavity backs will give you more distance because the face is thinner, giving it more of a trampoline effect, whereas the mizuno will give you way more workability with the loss of a couple yards. it is basically a comparison between cavity back vs blade because mizuno’s true cavity backs are in the mx series

14. JoeyClown Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Would you say… …
    Would you say…that the extra ball speed could in fact be due to the graphite shaft, juiced up lofts?

15. Kingjne92 Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    VV OH SNAP! VV
    VV OH SNAP! VV

16. MizunoMP94 Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    so is your mam
    so is your mam

17. macleanja Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    this guy is a clown
    this guy is a clown

Leave a Reply